| Course Outcome: team can... |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Score |
| 1. complete a transportation, water, structural, or environmental engineering
design project to meet desired needs, applying appropriate mathematical, science, and engineering methods. |
Little evidence of engineering design; little evidence of appropriate methods |
Basic engineering design; some needs identified; most methods appropriate |
Good engineering design; some needs identified; appropriate methods used |
Very good engineering design; most needs identified; appropriate methods used |
Comprehensive engineering design; all needs identified; appropriate methods used |
|
| 2. apply ethical, societal, legal, and other constraints in engineering design. |
No evidence of design constraints identified |
Few design constraints identified |
Several but not most design constraints identified |
Most but not all design constraints identified |
All appropriate design constraints identified |
|
| 3. apply engineering cost estimation techniques to a civil design project. |
No evidence of engineering cost estimation documented |
Rough cost estimates for some design components |
Good cost estimates for most design components |
Full cost estimates for most design components; appropriate standards |
Comprehensive estimation of full design cost; appropriate standards |
|
| 4. apply project management techniques to project construction schedules. |
No evidence of project management documented |
Minimal project scheduling; poor task time estimates |
Partial project schedule provided; some but not all time estimates valid |
Project schedule for most but not all tasks; most time estimates valid |
Comprehensive project schedule; valid techniques and estimates |
|
| 5. function as an active multi-disciplinary design team,
interact with development, design, and construction professions. |
Little evidence of team interaction in the design process |
Minimal interaction with team members and with client consutlants only |
Entry level interaction within team and with client/consultants, limited evidence with other professionals |
Entry level interaction within team and with client/consultants, some evidence with other professionals |
Professional team interaction with members, client/consultants, and other key parties |
|
| 7. effectively document design projects in a technical report. |
Little evidence of presentation skills, few members participating, poor graphics |
Average team presentation, most members participating, okay graphics |
Good team presentation, most members participating, good graphics |
Excellent team presentation, all members participating, excellent graphics |
Professional team presentation, all members participating, excellent graphics |
|
| 8. reflect knowledge of contemporary issues in civil and
environmental engineering, and of the need for professional licensure and
lifelong learning. |
does not reflects knowledge of any current issues in design practice |
some knowledge of current key issues in design practice |
good knowledge of current key issues in design practice |
excellent knowledge of current key issues in design practice |
comprehensive knowledge of current key issues in design practice |
|
| Overall Presentation Quality |
Poor |
Acceptable |
Good |
Very Good |
Excellent |
|
| Course Outcome: |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|